Skip to content
Fundamental AcousticsLaboratories / Est. 1958

Communications / Full-time

Science Communications Editor

Edit public research notes, press materials, and catalog language so the Laboratories remain clear, serious, and precise.

Requisition
FAL-CEA-26-005
Salary range
$92,000 - $126,000
Work model
Hybrid / remote eligible
Location
Remote or Calder Ridge Field Station, Ohio
Reports to
Director of Communications & External Affairs
Status
First review scheduled
Review begins
July 27, 2026
Close date
August 18, 2026
Role context

The communications office is expected to make uncertainty readable without making it exciting. That discipline matters more here than speed.

Application packet

Resume or CV

Three science, institutional, or technical writing samples

Short editing note on uncertainty, claims, and source discipline

Candidate exercise

A bounded edit of a public technical note with citations and uncertainty language preserved.

Requisition operations
Hiring manager
Eleanor Cross
Recruiting contact

Communications recruiting desk / FAL-CEA-26-005

Employment class

Full-time exempt staff appointment

Benefits tier

Continuing employee benefit tier

Routing code

REC-CEA-26-005-COM

Posting version

FAL-CEA-26-005-public-notice-09

Last updated

July 2, 2026

Search committee

  1. 01Eleanor Cross
  2. 02Communications recruiting desk
  3. 03External Affairs standards delegate
Record retention

Recruiting active file plus finalist review record

Candidate review rubric

How this packet is evaluated

Review family

Communications

Access posture

Finalist review covers embargo discipline, citation hygiene, claim boundaries, and correction handling.

Packet handling

Complete packets are logged under REC-CEA-26-005-COM, separated from public correspondence, and assigned to the Communications recruiting desk for first read.

Exercise boundary

Any exercise is bounded, redacted, and evaluated only for hiring. It is not added to the catalog, public systems, grant files, or laboratory work product.

CriterionWeightEvidence reviewed
Source discipline30%Preserves citations, caveats, correction state, and claim boundaries.
Technical editing25%Makes difficult material readable without changing its meaning.
Institutional voice25%Keeps public language serious, restrained, and non-sensational.
Media judgment20%Knows when to route, decline, correct, or narrow a public request.
Finalist checks
  1. 01Reference check after candidate notice
  2. 02Station access and site-duty acknowledgement
  3. 03Records-handling and confidentiality review
  4. 04Program-office recommendation before offer
Committee docket

Candidate review docket REC-CEA-26-005-COM; public posting version FAL-CEA-26-005-public-notice-09.

Responsibilities

  • Edit source-backed research notes and institutional releases
  • Maintain language standards for unresolved detections and public claims
  • Coordinate with researchers on citations, caveats, and review status
  • Prepare press kits, statements, and public FAQs

Qualifications

  • Five or more years in science writing, institutional communications, or technical editing
  • Ability to make complex uncertainty readable without flattening it
  • Strong source hygiene and fact-checking habits
  • No appetite for sensationalism

Preferred experience

  • Experience with observatories, foundations, laboratories, or research universities
  • Experience writing for both public and specialist audiences

What good work looks like

  • Public notes are source-backed, cautious, and readable
  • Researchers see fewer corrections after release
  • Press requests are answered without creating claims the record cannot hold
Appointment

Continuing staff appointment

Station duty

Two station residencies per year plus major release windows

Travel

Limited media, collaborator, and public-program travel

Access review

Writing sample review and confidentiality attestation required

Hiring process

  1. 1Writing samples
  2. 2Editing exercise
  3. 3Researcher panel
  4. 4Final communications interview
Program review timeline

Recruiting acknowledges complete packets within five business days and routes them to the program office named on the requisition.

Access, relocation, and accommodations

Station review

Two station residencies per year plus major release windows

Relocation

Relocation support is reviewed after finalist stage for continuing Calder Ridge appointments.

Accommodation path

Candidates may request accommodation support through recruiting before any timed exercise or station visit.

Recruiting desk

Communications recruiting desk, FAL-CEA-26-005

  • Recruiting will not request references until the candidate is notified.
  • Finalist access checks are started only after a program panel recommends continued review.
  • Candidate materials are retained under the recruiting records schedule and are not used as public work product.

Candidate materials remain in the recruiting record and are not used as laboratory work product, public samples, or source material for the catalog.

Candidates may request accommodations before any timed exercise, station visit, or access-review step by contacting the recruiting desk listed on the requisition.

FAL evaluates candidates without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, veteran status, age, or any other protected status.

Apply

Apply for this position

Applications are read by the relevant program. Include links to your CV, publications, or portfolio where relevant. For station roles, use the message field to note any field, access-controlled, archive, or remote-site experience that would help the review panel.

Applications enter a restricted recruiting queue for FAL-CEA-26-005. Do not include confidential employer material, restricted research data, personal identity documents, or anything that cannot be shared with the program review panel.

Optional. Include country code if outside the United States.

City, state/region, and country.

Optional. Earliest start date or notice period.

Requested materials
  • Resume or CV
  • Three science, institutional, or technical writing samples
  • Short editing note on uncertainty, claims, and source discipline

One or more URLs. Do not link restricted employer repositories.

Describe how you make unresolved evidence readable without making it sensational.

Link to writing or editing samples that show source hygiene and restraint.

Optional. Timing, travel, station visit, or exercise accommodation constraints.