Skip to content
Fundamental AcousticsLaboratories / Est. 1958
FAL-FIND-23-0902 · Class III -- unresolved

A resonance that keeps the calendar

A ground resonance whose returns correlate with dates on the calendar rather than with any motion of the sky.

Most recurring signals, if they recur at all, follow something in motion: the rotation of the earth, the passage of a satellite, the turning of the sky. FA-0902 does not. Its returns, logged over eleven years, correlate with fixed dates, and with nothing the Laboratories can find in the heavens.

The Laboratories have no mechanism to offer for a signal that keeps a human calendar. They record that it does, that the correlation is stronger than chance, and that it remains under study because the simpler explanations have failed.

Public evidence packet

What the public record includes

Ground-coupled recurrence table with maintenance and downtime removed.
Calendar-alignment model compared against sidereal, lunar, seasonal, and orbital periods.
Sensor-lineage statement for the public observation interval.
Null result memo for local machinery, pump cycles, and road access events.
Review chronology
2013-01-01

Modern recurrence file opened

Older station notes are consolidated into a ground-coupled review file.

2016-09-12

Calendar correlation noted

Analysts identify stronger date alignment than sidereal or seasonal alignment.

2021-04-16

Instrument-lineage review

Calibration breaks are reviewed and the recurrence remains in the retained record.

2026-04-30

Public model release

Released as a behavioral record with station positions suppressed.

Review method

  • Date-aligned recurrence testing with downtime removed.
  • Ground-coupled vibration rejection.
  • Comparison against lunar, solar, sidereal, and orbital period families.
  • Station-maintenance and access-road ledger comparison.

Ordinary sources checked

  • facility pump cycle
  • scheduled maintenance
  • road or gate activity
  • sidereal period match
Release limits
  • Station positions are not public.
  • The model is a correlation record, not a mechanism.
  • Future returns require two-person public release review.